148. if any new idea, a doctrine, a new philosophy, or even a political or economic movement tries to deny the entire past, tries to make it bad or worthless, for this reason alone we must be extremely cautious and suspicious. As a rule the reason for such hatred is either its own inferiority or even an evil intention as such.


There is a terrible truth in the above words. I have noticed in India, people simply mention glorious antiquities of the land some 7000 years back. They simply ignore the antiquity of their land just 50 or hundred or two hundred or five hundred years back. Every man who is not a Christian or a Muslims simply has attached himself or herself to the Hindu religion, even though it is crystal clear that only very few people from the highest castes are actually from that heritage. The other castes have their own gods, spiritual phenomena etc. which currently they try to attach to Hindu gods.


Then there were the terribly low-castes of Travancore who had converted into Christians. They, after encroaching the forest lands of Malabar, are reasonably super-rich or rich. However, they do not like anyone mentioning their own antiquity. They themselves do not like to be mentioned as the descendants of lower castes.


To some extent, this repulsion to their own antiquity is due to the fact that the same caste people who had not converted into Christianity have remained on the floor bottom of the Hindu caste system, even though the lower castes are not Hindus as such. The converts who could encroach and occupy the forest lands are rich. Those who did not do this are quite poor and socially weak.


149. In the nineteenth century, our cities began more and more to lose the character of cultural sites and to descend to the level of mere human settlements


In India people, from interiors, the moment they feel that the feudal language strictures are too much, people rush off to towns and cities, where the general atmosphere of anonymity helps them. For, in cities and town, moving around on the road is just like moving in a village fair. The freedom that rushing crowds give is something not see-able in native-English nations. In fact, the atmosphere on the streets is most joyous, due to the fact it is like that of the screeching birds, that have escaped from their cages.


150. While both denominations maintain missions in Asia and Africa in order to win new followers for their doctrine-an activity which can boast but very modest success compared to the advance of the Mohammedan faith in particular right here in Europe, they lose millions and millions of inward adherents who either are alien to all religious life or simply go their own ways.


There is another danger in all attempts to bring in others of a different kind into any religion in modern times. Every system’s maintenance of quality is under the threat of democracy. It goes without saying that in days to come, all quality institutions will shift to the dominance of populations that breed in a terrific speed. In India, all Muslims did accept that they should have a minimum of three children.


Hindu brahimin and other castes were not under such a compulsion, even though many of them did have more than two children. Now, the Christian groups have also woken up to the need for population strength within their own leadership. For, numerical superiority is the key to political leadership, which in turn is the key to getting access to national resources for themselves. The Christian priests have reportedly conveyed the message to all members in their congregations that all couples should have a minimum of three children.


Going into Africa and Asia and converting the local people there was indeed a very stupid action on the part of the English evangelists. I cannot say anything about Continental European Missionaries. But as to English Missionaries, it was a thankless job. Moreover, they never sought the concurrence and permission of their fellow countrymen before embarking on disseminating the native technical and entrepreneurial skills and education to populations who will immediately spring up to compete.


In those far-flung times, there was no Internet, Mobile Phones, Aircrafts or modern ships. But then what these Missionaries did can be equivalent to what people like Bill Gates etc. did. Giving national technical skills to outsiders. Leading to their own national industries going down, and local people losing jobs.


If indeed such an activity has to be done, it should have been done under England’s national advisory board’s concurrence and study. As to give what to which group of people and what is to be expected in return. Actually, there was no problem, for the English Empire was there to connect everyone under England. But the foolhardy Clement Atlee and co. had no great intelligence and information on what was to done with the huge power that came into his hands.


However, if it is a nation like China, it would be quite difficult to get even one single piece of technical knowledge out. Unless and until it is ratified by the national government. This is not a new issue. Even centuries back, they did not allow anyone to take out their Silk industry secrets. In India, no one will share his or her own technical information. Actually everyone with such information would literally take the information seeker on a wild goose chase.


151. the value of a religion must be estimated less by its deficiencies than by the virtue of a visibly better substitute


In most social systems, religion acts as a regimenting tool. Religion is not a spiritual entity beyond a certain limit. It is literally like an army with its own hierarchies. Only in English would this system not work much. For instance, in any English nation, an ordinary citizen doesn’t want a political or social leader to accompany him to the police station. Nor would he or she require a recommendation from a political leader to get an official paper from a government office at the appropriate time.


However, in feudal language nations, some such appendage is required for many things for the citizen. One is the local parish priest, in the case of Christians. Politicians understand the value of getting along with social/religious regimentation. If they go against it, people will be prohibited from supporting him or her, by their regimenting religious leadership.


152. ....millions of Germans were driven to face the enemy half-trained and badly trained.....


The tendency to build all ships a little smaller than the English ships which were being launched at the same time was hardly farsighted, much less brilliant


It is the superior fighting power which matters and not any legendary superiority in ‘quality.


They declared, for instance, that the material of the German guns was so obviously superior to the British that the German 28-centimeter gun was not behind the British 30.5centimeter gun in performance!!


The above four quotes are slightly out-of-step from Adolf Hitler’s previous assessment of England’s power.


Look at the first one. Half-trained and badly trained German soldiers being sent to fight. The fact is that the same was also the case with England in most of her battles. Not only during the German blitz, but also in the past centuries, in the colonial areas, the English side soldiers were not even proper soldiers. Even Robert Clive was just a clerk in a trading post. So again, it was not military training that inevitably propelled England to sure victory. Nor was this the reason that Germany and others who fought against England inevitably lost. The exact reasons were not in the munitions or in the battle field, but in the codes in the language.


Ships big or small, airships fast or slow, English people bore the brunt, without being splintered by mutual jealously, envy, backstabbing and terrors connected to pejorative/ennobling indicants. That was all.


153. If in the battle of Skagerrak the German ships had had the tonnage, the armament, the same speed as the English ships, the British navy would have found a watery grave


In the hundreds of battle engagements in the Indian subcontinent, in all of which the English side had consistently won, I have seen plenty of similar claims. That this was not there, that was not there, this should have been done, he shouldn’t give that order, there was a better alternative etc. which would have defeated the English side. Yet, the singular reason why the English side won was due to their native language English, pristine, planar and plateau-coded.


154. For compared to these traitors to the nation, every pimp is a man of honour.


It may shock the reader the above words are about Germans, whom Adolf Hitler mentions as Aryans.


155. THERE are some truths which are so obvious that for this very reason they are not seen or at least not recognized by ordinary people. They sometimes pass by such truisms as though blind and are most astonished when someone suddenly discovers what everyone really ought to know.


I would have been quite happy to know that Adolf Hitler seems to mention my own contentions about the powers in the codes in languages. It is something anyone can or should know. But alas, Adolf Hitler is speaking about his own racial segregation or Aryan or German superiority ideas.


156. The stronger must dominate and not blend with the weaker, thus sacrificing his own greatness.


Yes, this could be a very correct conceptualisation. I have experimented with this idea, and seen that it is correct. However, I do not see any superiority in any race or skin colour or in Aryan or Anglo-Saxon. In fact, if the Anglo-Saxon is taught any of the feudal languages of the Indian peninsula and brought up in it pejorative part, he or she will not show any bit of racial or physical or mental superiority.


It will be inferiority encoded everywhere. Check the story of James Scurry, Englishman who was enslaved by Sultan Tipu, king of a small kingdom in the southern part of the Indian peninsula. He was made to learn the local vernacular and addressed and referred to in the pejorative part of the language. He literally metamorphosed into a native servant boy with very little English looks or demeanour.

Readers are also requested to read my own book: Shrouded Satanism in Feudal Languages.


157. For, since the inferior always predominates numerically over the best, if both had the same possibility of preserving life and propagating, the inferior would multiply so much more rapidly


It is a truth that quality is required only in small quantity. However, in modern days when democracy as well as access to everyone into the interiors of all English nations has become the norm, there is no way to stop quantity from conquering quality, and beating it into pulp in a mood of greenish envy.


However, looking at the storming of Continental Europe and in a few years to come of all English nations, by populations who, instead of using munitions, use subtle means of appealing to the sympathy and naivety of the people, it does seem that Adolf Hitler was quite correct. However speaking of naivety and gullibility, it is an art used in hunting and fishing to delude the prey by means of something alluring. It does seem that Continental Europe, Australia, Canada, USA and even England are falling prey to this premeditated technique of overpowering a powerful antagonist or prey.


The useless preoccupations that all the preyed upon nations are having with elections and such rot, are going to be downfall of all these nations. Elections are literally the case of fiddling when Rome is burning. Or worse, joining up for an infighting when the enemy is at the door.


158. every mingling of Aryan blood with that of lower peoples the result was the end of the cultured people. North America, whose population consists in by far the largest part of Germanic elements who mixed but little with the lower coloured peoples, shows a different humanity and culture from Central and South America, where the predominantly Latin immigrants often mixed with the aborigines on a large scale.

This is the exact point where Adolf Hitler’s lack of understanding of the language codes is visible in its full glory. I have heard people say that the US is great because it is build by immigrants. This nonsense is for the birds, literally. Immigrants, among whom such nationalities like the English are not present, cannot create any great social or national set-up at all.


People have told me variously that it is the Spanish, the Italians, the Japs, the Mexicans, the Chinese, the Indians (Indian peninsula location), who have created the great nation of United States of America.


The fact is that if all these aforementioned peoples are put together in one location, with no English among them, but some other language like Mandarin, or Spanish or Japanese or Italian or Hindi or Tamil etc. is the common language, instead of creating a great nation or society, they would set up something worse than South America.


The peoples who have stood to bring in quality degradation to this English nation, includes Continental European, Negros, Asians, South American etc.


The native Red Indians who stood by the English rule there must have improved on the lines set-up by the British Government. However, with the swarming in crowds from everywhere, they would have lost their stand, as the British government also lost its footing there.


To know that a pristine-ENGLISH ambience would improve anyone, one need not go to the US. It can be experienced from anywhere. Adolf Hitler’s claim that it is the Germanic blood in the USA that created a great culture there is utter nonsense. In fact, this very book Mein Kampf itself doesn’t give even an iota of hint there was any quality culture in Germany.


Almost everything mentioned about the reality of the German standards is mentioned as low quality, degrading, mutual stabbing in the back etc.


How then can these same elements go to another nation and display higher qualities which are not innate to them? It goes without saying that everyone would improve in a pristine-ENGLISH ambience. For the languages codes are planar and plateau-coded.

MEIN KAMPF by Adolf Hitler - A demystification!

VED from VICTORIA INSTITUTIONS

Annotations VOL - 1 : 148 to 158

VED.jpg