119. For the greater a man’s works for the future, the less the present can comprehend them; the harder his fight, and the rarer success. If, however, once in centuries success does come to a man, perhaps in his latter days a faint beam of his coming glory may shine upon him. To be sure, these great men are only the Marathon runners of history; the laurel wreath of the present touches only the brow of the dying hero.


Among them must be counted the great warriors in this world who, though not understood by the present, are nevertheless prepared to carry the fight for their ideas and ideals to their end. They are the men who someday will be closest to the heart of the people;



True it might be that there are solitary individuals who work for on a long-term basis. However, what is missed in this understanding is the colossal work of the English colonialists in the far-flung nations.


Living in solitary locations, working for the uplift of the oppressed classes, with nothing great in the ambiences, creating fabulous administrative systems, writing details procedures, creating things that are absolutely new (like the postal system in British-India), building roads, bridges, dams, drinking water supply systems, building up waterways to water the agricultural farms, setting up schools, setting up law and order machinery that applies to all including themselves, building the huge structure of the present-day Indian Railways, the police, the army etc.


It goes without saying that an insipid James Bond designed by Italian, Japanese and Hollywood is a very far cry from the original English colonialists.


120. politicians will keep far removed from all really weighty plans for the future, in order not to lose the momentary sympathy of the great mob.


True! Yet, in the regions of the Indian subcontinent under the rule of English colonialism, everything was done with perfect farsightedness. But then, they did not have to care about politicians. Nor were they corrupt and bribe-seeking.


121. Therefore, his life is torn by love and hate. The protest of the present which does not understand the man, struggles with the recognition of posterity-for which he works


Adolf Hitler speaks of the theoretician and the practical politician, appearing in the same person. However, it is a monumental struggle to clear up the nation of its feudal languages.


122. Among them must be counted the great warriors in this world who, though not understood by the present, are nevertheless prepared to carry the fight for their ideas and ideals to their end. They are the men who someday will be closest to the heart of the people;


I am sure that in days to come many people in the world would come out openly expressing their support for the bygone English colonialism, pure and true English. Not the nonsense that has taken over England.


123. What we must fight for is to safeguard the existence and reproduction of our race and our people, the sustenance of our children and the purity of our blood, the freedom and independence of the fatherland, so that our people may mature for the fulfilment of the mission allotted it by the creator of the universe.


The above statement when made by Adolf Hitler, does have a slight aura of some extreme racist claims. However, there is nothing wrong in it. Yet, this is a best if England had thought about it. It would have been a great situation if England had remained pure, if not fully in blood, at least in its language and the culture promoted by the language English. With no compromise given. In fact, any man or institution or nation that took part in the desecration of pristine-ENGLISH should have been shown the way out.


In which case, the current-day USA is one of the greatest desecrators of English. In fact, its action of creating a very erroneous English has given legitimacy to the similar desecrations all over the world. I member one Indian minister justifying erroneous English as saying that ‘This is Indian English. Just like there is the American English, this is Indian English’.


124. The so called ‘intelligentsia’ always looks down with a really limitless condescension on anyone who has not been dragged through the obligatory schools and had the necessary knowledge pumped into him.


Adolf Hitler is right on target about the utter uselessness of modern formal education. Simply wasting some to 15 to 20 years on some nonsense called certificates, diplomas, degrees etc. To feed teachers who don’t know much beyond the insipid items in their textbooks.


However, I need to qualify this statement by saying that the education of England if given to the students in the low-class nations like those in South America, certain Continental European nations, Asia, Africa etc. including China, India, Pakistan etc. can be quite beneficial. This is due to the tremendous social communication changes a pristine-English education can bring in.


However, from a universal outlook, connecting formal education to anything including information, jobs, skills, right to government job, right to management jobs, right to technical jobs etc. is utter nonsense. However connecting pristine-ENGLISH to senior management jobs can be good.


For, it can elevate the individuality of everyone in the various layers of the management and labour structure. Actually, mere profundity in pristine-English antiquity should be the minimum qualification that can be denoted as educated. Technical education is not education.


Formal technical education cannot compete with the real life experience in technical skills of uneducated technicians. For instance, I have seen totally uneducated carpenters envisaging and constructing huge building structures in wood. In fact, most people who have studied computer software work privately can outdo and overtake most formally qualified computer engineers. That is my experience.


Interested readers can read my own book: Compulsory Formal Education: A travesty. [This book is not about education per se, but about things that are outside the parameters of formal education].


The gist of the idea could be that formal education should be pulled out of the hands of current-day academicians. It should be handed over to the hands of extremely pro-English individuals. Technical education should be only for technical work. And not for management. Management qualification should be a very deep reading knowledge in classical English literature (not Shakespeare), English colonial history etc. Such nations will metamorphosis into Englands. There will be no need to run-off to England as legal and illegal immigrants.


I remember reading first-hand reports of Germans trying to immigrate to the US, right when the World War 1 was in full swing. They were not Jews. They were learning English, when their nation was fighting with England. (Read: Germany In War Time: What An American Girl Saw And Heard By Mary Ethel Mcauley)


There are more secrets inside the pristine-ENGLISH codes than what the world knows of now. People who have seen inside of both feudal languages as well as pristine-ENGLISH know this. Some admit it openly. Others fear that their own fellow-natives will also get to learn English and in a mood of selfish envy, mention bad cautionary words about English: Do not study English. It is a foreign language.

125. THE EXTENT of the fall of a body is always measured by the distance between its momentary position and the one it originally occupied. The same is true of nations and states.


This is slightly similar to an observation that I had made in my own book: SHROUDED SATANISM IN feudal languages. I had discussed it to illustrate the location of various nations and cities. For instance, Bangalore in India is in location towards England or America.


However, England has shifted from its former historical location to a direction nearer to India, Pakistan, and other low-class nations. In the inner codes, Bangalore will be seen to be glued to positive values that show the direction of shift. As to England, in the virtual location, negative values would be seen superimposing on its direction-of-shift codes.


126. The cure of a sickness can only be achieved if its cause is known, and the same is true of curing political evils


This observation of Adolf Hitler is of quite profundity. However it is doubtful if he has envisaged what is the real negativity that infects his nation. It would be in the codes in the native languages there. If it is feudal, this fact would be reflected in the Lick the upper man, Kick the lower man conceptualisation of social behaviour.


However, the intensity of this issue will depend on the exact codes in each individual language. For instance, in one south Indian language, the word ‘She’/’Her’ comes in two different forms. One of extreme ‘respect’ and the other of ‘total degradation’. This code variation is very much reflected in the behaviour of the local females.


A simpleton-like women, who is quite coy and meek, suddenly turning into a most daring, outgoing and even ferocious person, the moment she become a ‘somebody’ like a teacher or gets some persons to boss over.


At the same time, in a language in a neighbouring location, for the word ‘She’/‘Her’, there is a lot of words of varying social ‘respect’ and ‘degradation’. Women do not suddenly move from one extreme to another very fast in the ‘respect’ / ‘degradation’ code. They move slowly from one to another. The rapid change of personality seen in the former language is not visible here.


127. regard the German collapse as primarily an ‘economic catastrophe,’ which can therefore be cured by economic means, is one of the reasons why a recovery has hitherto been impossible. Only when it is understood that here, too, economics is only of second or third-rate importance, and the primary role falls to factors of politics, ethics, morality, and blood,


It is quite curious that Adolf Hitler missed the total container of all errors that he lists out. This total container is language. If there are errors in it, it would spoil everything.


128. German victories, won for four years against a whole world, must regardless of all heroic courage and ‘organisation,’ be attributed solely to superior leadership,


Victories by feudal language systems are basically the efficient arrangement of the various layers of hierarchy in a most immovable manner. For instance, the Indian army’s hierarchy is kept in a most rigid manner by the each layer of soldiery kept in position by means of the Thoo-Aap connections. English is allowed only among the officer class.


This English in the officer class gives more leeway for intelligent communication amongst the officers. However, just below them are the varying layer of soldiery kept in a most shackled manner. To induce English into this layer would be most unintelligent. For, English would bring disarray into a tightly held hierarchy discipline. Yet this type of discipline has a negative side.


If the officer class and the nation seems to be withering away, discipline will be lost, and nothing will be there to replace it. For the soldiery are kept as unintelligent slaves, and they are not expected to act intelligently. If they do act intelligently, it would only send shockwaves across the command structure.


129. The organisation and leadership of the German army were the mightiest that the earth had ever seen


I can’t say anything about this claim. However when taken in numerical terms, there were mighty ‘empires’ in the northern parts of the Indian peninsula, and also in ancient China. However, these wouldn’t be professional armies. At best, a huge grouping of armed people with no specific ideas of military parading, marching etc.


And there is this information also to be mentioned. As Adolf Hitler himself admits, England’s lack of military power does not mean anything. In times of need, England could very easily raise an army from its common people. There is a very visible code-arrangement inside pristine-ENGLISH that allows this. Or makes it possible.


Yes, in the case of the German victories, superior leadership is the reason. However, in the case of the English victories, it cannot be superior leadership. For, in all contests, the superior leadership was not on the English side. Even in the Battle of Britain days, Adolf Hitler was a much superior leader